Ir al contenido principal Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Artículos
Publicado: 2025-12-05

Volver a revisar los nasales en el náhuatl de Karttunen y Lockhart: nuevas ideas basadas en la fonología y la fonética del náhuatl de Chicontepec

San Diego State University
Véase la biografía del autor
×

Andres Ehecatl Aguilar

Is assistant professor in the Department of Chicano and Chicana Studies at San Diego State University (SDSU). His work focuses on contemporary Nahuatl’s phonetics, phonology and morphology. In his research, he has developed innovative techniques for high quality field recordings for acoustic analysis. In another line of inquiry, his work focuses on transnational pan-Indigenous movements within their Chicano context, such as the Danza de Concheros in the United States. Correo electrónico: aaguilar26@sdsu.edu.

nasales en el náhuatl náhuatl de Chicontepec náhuatl de la Huasteca sonidos laríngeos glotales

Resumen

En un artículo corto sobre los sonidos nasales en náhuatl escrito en 1976, Karttunen y Lockhart abordaron el comportamiento errático de los nasales en un texto náhuatl del siglo XVIII. Este artículo amplía su discusión sobre los nasales en el náhuatl con ideas procedentes de análisis fonológicos y fonéticos de variantes contemporáneas del náhuatl. Fenómenos como la lenición y la neutralización fonológica, la glotalización prosódica y la relación entre los sonidos nasales y laríngeos se exploran aquí como una explicación novedosa de los patrones que observaron para los nasales intrusivos y omitidos en la ortografía del texto de la época colonial. Al hacerlo, se discute la compleja disposición de las articulaciones laríngeas y nasales en la fonología del náhuatl y cómo se relaciona con la representación escrita. Este artículo se basa en trabajo de campo sobre el náhuatl de Chicontepec, una variante del náhuatl de la Huasteca oriental, así como en descripciones publicadas de otras variantes del náhuatl. Contribuye a la bibliografía sobre las variantes históricas del náhuatl y al conocimiento sobre la relación entre el náhuatl escrito y el hablado.

Citas

  1. Aguilar, Andrés Ehécatl. 2020. “Phonology and Phonetics of Laryngeal Sounds in Chicontepec Nahuatl.” Doctoral dissertation. University of California. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/27r2x19w.
  2. Aguilar, Andrés Ehécatl. 2023. “Pre-Pausal Glottalization in Chicontepec Nahuatl.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 3432-3436. Prague: International Phonetic Association. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2023/full_papers/1055.pdf.
  3. Bauer, Laurie. 2008. “Lenition Revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 44 (3): 605-624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226708005331.
  4. Beller, Richard, and Patricia Beller. 1979. “Huasteca Nahuatl.” In Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar 2, Modern Aztec Grammatical Sketches. Edited by Ronald Wayne Langacker, 199-306. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics; Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington.
  5. Bickley, Corine. 1982. “Acoustic Analysis and Perception of Breathy Vowels.” Speech Communication Group Working Papers 1: 71-81.
  6. Blevins, Juliette, and Andrew Garrett. 1993. “The Evolution of Ponapeic Nasal Substitution.” Oceanic Linguistics 32 (2): 199-236. https://doi.org/10.2307/3623193.
  7. Boas, Franz, and David Beck. (1917) 2017. “The Mexicano (Nahuatl) Dialect of Pochutla, Oaxaca.” International Journal of American Linguistics 83 (2): 365-442. https://doi.org/10.1086/689752.
  8. Brockway, Earl. 1963. “The Phonemes of North Puebla Nahuatl.” Anthropological Linguistics 5: 14-18. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30022406?seq=1.
  9. Brockway, Earl. 1979. “North Puebla Nahuatl.” In Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar 2, Modern Aztec Grammatical Sketches. Edited by Ronald Wayne Langacker, 143-198. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics; Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington.
  10. Campbell, R. Joe. 1976. “Underlying /ŋw/ in Hueyapan Nahuatl.” International Journal of American Linguistics 42 (1): 46-50. https://doi.org/10.1086/465385.
  11. Campbell, Lyle. 2011. The Pipil Language of El Salvador. Vol. 1. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
  12. Canger, Una. 2000. “Stress in Nahuatl of Durango. Whose Stress?” In Uto-Aztecan Structural, Temporal, and Geographic Perspective. Edited by Eugene H. Casad and Thomas L. Willet, 373-386. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.
  13. Canger, Una. 2011. “El nauatl urbano de Tlatelolco/Tenochtitlan, resultado de convergencia entre dialectos. Con un esbozo brevísimo de la historia de los dialectos.” Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl 42: 243-258. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://nahuatl.historicas.unam.mx/index.php/ecn/article/view/26560.
  14. Canger, Una, and Karen Dakin. 1985. “An Inconspicuous Basic Split in Nahuatl.” International Journal of American Linguistics 51 (4): 358-361. https://doi.org/10.1086/465892.
  15. Chen, Marilyn Y. 1997. “Acoustic Correlates of English and French Nasalized Vowels.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (4): 2360-2370. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.419620.
  16. Clements, George N., and Samuel J. Keyser. 1983. cv Phonology. A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  17. Cline, Sarah L., and Miguel León-Portilla, eds. 1984. The Testaments of Culhuacan. vol. 2. Los Angeles: University of California in Los Angeles Latin American Center Publications.
  18. Croft, Kenneth. 1951. “Practical Orthography for Matlapa Nahuatl.” International Journal of American Linguistics 17 (1): 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1086/464097.
  19. Cuauhtli, Chris. 2022. Ma Tiłahtucan Mexicano = Let’s Speak Mexicano. Independently published.
  20. De Lacey, Paul Valiant. 2002. “The Formal Expression of Markedness.” Doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts Amherst. https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3K35SHJ.
  21. Flores Farfán, José Antonio. 2003. “Efectos del contacto náhuatl-español en la región del Balsas, Guerrero. Desplazamiento, mantenimiento y resistencia lingüística.” Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl 34: 331-348. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://nahuatl.historicas.unam.mx/index.php/ecn/article/view/78665.
  22. Garellek, Marc. 2015. “Perception of Glottalization and Phrase-Final Creak.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (2): 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4906155.
  23. Garellek, Marc. 2022. “Theoretical Achievements of Phonetics in the 21st Century. Phonetics of Voice Quality.” Journal of Phonetics 94: 101-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101155.
  24. Garellek, Marc, Amanda Ritchart, and Jianjing Kuang. 2016. “Breathy Voice During Nasality. A Cross-Linguistic Study.” Journal of Phonetics 59: 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.001.
  25. Garellek, Marc, and Patricia Keating. 2011. “The Acoustic Consequences of Phonation and Tone Interactions in Jalapa Mazatec.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41 (2): 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100311000193.
  26. Goller, Theodore R., Patricia L. Goller, and Viola G. Waterhouse. 1974. “The Phonemes of Orizaba Nahuatl.” International Journal of American Linguistics 40 (2): 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1086/465295.
  27. Gordon, Matthew, and Peter Ladefoged. 2001. “Phonation Types. A Cross-Linguistic Overview.” Journal of Phonetics 29 (4): 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0147.
  28. Guion, Susan G., Jonathan D. Amith, Christopher S. Doty, and Irina A. Shport. 2010. “Word-Level Prosody in Balsas Nahuatl. The Origin, Development, and Acoustic Correlates of Tone in a Stress Accent Language.” Journal of Phonetics 38 (2): 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.03.006.
  29. Harris, James W. 1984. “Autosegmental Phonology, Lexical Phonology, and Spanish Nasals.” In Language Sound Structure. Studies in Phonology. Edited by Morris Halle, Mark Aronoff and Richard T. Oehrle, 67-82. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  30. Hejná, Michaela. 2023. “I can be both? (Pre-)aspiration and (pre-) Glottalization Do Not Have to Be Mutually Exclusive.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1851-1855. Praga: International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2023/full_papers/215.pdf.
  31. Igartua, Iván. 2008. “La aspiración de origen nasal en la evolución fonológica del euskera. Un caso de ‘rhinoglottophilia’.” Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo 42 (1): 171-189. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/2305/2344.
  32. Johnson, Keith, Christian T. DiCanio, and Laurel MacKenzie. 2007. “The Acoustic and Visual Phonetic Basis of Place of Articulation in Excrescent Nasals.” UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report: 529-561. https://doi.org/10.5070/P70n17f74x.
  33. Johnson, Sarah E., Marissa Barlaz, Ryan K. Shosted, and Brad P. Sutton. 2019. “Spontaneous Nasalization After Glottal Consonants in Thai.” Journal of Phonetics 75: 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.05.001.
  34. Kahn, Daniel. 1976. “Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology.” Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/16397.
  35. Karttunen, Frances E. 1992. An Analytical Dictionary of Nahuatl. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  36. Karttunen, Frances, and James Lockhart. 1976. “Nahuatl nasals.” Linguistic Inquiry 7 (2): 380-383.
  37. Katz, Jonah. 2016. “Lenition, Perception and Neutralisation.” Phonology 33 (1): 43-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675716000038.
  38. Keer, Edward. 1998. “Icelandic Preaspiration and the Moraic Theory of Geminates.” In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, 1-11. Reykjavik: University of Iceland.
  39. Key, Mary, and Harold Key. 1953. “The Phonemes of Sierra Nahuat.” International Journal of American Linguistics 19 (1): 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1086/464190.
  40. Kimball, Geoffrey. 1990. “Noun Pluralization in Eastern Huasteca Nahuatl.” International Journal of American Linguistics 56 (2): 196-216. https://doi.org/10.1086/466150.
  41. Kirchner, Robert. 2013. An Effort-Based Approach to Consonant Lenition. London: Routledge.
  42. Klatt, Dennis H., and Laura C. Klatt. 1990. “Analysis, Synthesis, and Perception of Voice Quality Variations Among Female and Male Talkers.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 (2): 820-857. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.398894.
  43. Maeda, Shinji. 1993. “Acoustics of Vowel Nasalization and Articulatory Shifts in French Nasal Vowels.” In Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum. Edited by Marie Huffman and Rena Krakow, 147-167. New York: Academic Press.
  44. Matisoff, James A. 1975. “Rhinoglottophilia. The Mysterious Connection Between Nasality and Glottality.” In Nasálfest. Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization. Edited by C. A. Ferguson, L. M. Hyman, and J. J. Ohala, 265-287. Stanford: Stanford University Language Universals Project.
  45. Melton-Villanueva, Miriam. 2016. The Aztecs at Independence. Nahua Culture Makers in Central Mexico 1799-1832. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  46. Molina, Alonso de. (1571) 1970. Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana y mexicana y castellana. Preliminary study by Miguel León-Portilla. Mexico: Porrúa.
  47. O’Brien, Jeremy. 2012. “An Experimental Approach to Debuccalization and Supplementary Gestures.” Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz. https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3G73BR0.
  48. Ohala, John J. 1975 “Phonetic Explanations for Nasal Sound Patterns.” In Nasálfest: Papers from a Symposium on Nasals and Nasalization. Edited by Charles A. Ferguson, Larry M. Hyman, and John J. Ohala, 289-316. Palo Alto: Stanford University Language Universals Project.
  49. Ohala, John J. 1980. “The Application of Phonological Universals in Speech Pathology.” Speech and Language 3: 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-608603-4.50009-3.
  50. Pierrehumbert, Janet, and David Talkin. 1992. “Lenition of /h/ and Glottal Stop.” In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 2: 90-117. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/jpierrehumbert/publications/lenition_h.pdf.
  51. Pittman, Richard Saunders. 1954. “A Grammar of Tetelcingo (Morelos) Nahuatl.” Language 30 (1): 5–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/522207.
  52. Robinson, Dow F. 1969. “Puebla (Sierra) Nahuat prosodies.” In Aztec Studies 1. Phonological and Grammatical Studies in Modern Nahuatl Dialects. Edited by Dow F. Robinson, 17-32. Norman: University of Oklahoma/Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  53. Rojas Rabiela, Teresa, Elsa Leticia Rea López, and Constantino Medina Lima. 1999. Vidas y bienes olvidados. Testamentos en náhuatl y castellano del siglo XVI, Testamentos indígenas novohispanos. Vol. 2. Mexico: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.
  54. Sasaki, Mitsuya. 2014. “A Dialectological Sketch of Ixquihuacan Nahuatl.” Tokyo University Linguistic Papers 35: 139-170. https://doi.org/10.15083/00027463.
  55. Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1982. “The Syllable.” In The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part II. Edited by Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith, 337-83. Dordrecht: Foris.
  56. Shosted, Ryan Keith. 2011. “Excrescent Nasal Codas in Brazilian Portuguese. An Electropalatographic Study.” In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1834-1837. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2015/barlaz15_interspeech.pdf.
  57. Simpson, Adrian P. 2012. “The First and Second Harmonics Should Not Be Used to Measure Breathiness in Male and Female Voices.” Journal of Phonetics 40 (3): 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.001.
  58. Sischo, William R. 1979. “Michoacan Nahuatl.” In Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar 2, Modern Aztec Grammatical Sketches. Edited by Ronald Wayne Langacker, 307-38. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics; Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington.
  59. Stevens, Kenneth N. 2000. Acoustic Phonetics, vol. 30. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  60. Stevens, Mary, and John Hajek. 2004. “Comparing Voiced and Voiceless Geminates in Sienese Italian. What Role Does Preaspiration Play?” In Proceedings of the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 340-345. Sydney: Macquarie University.
  61. Styler, Will. 2015. “On the Acoustical and Perceptual Features of Vowel Nasality.” Doctoral dissertation. University of Colorado at Boulder. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://wstyler.ucsd.edu/files/styler_dissertation_final.pdf.
  62. Treiman, Rebecca. 1985. “Phonemic Awareness and Spelling. Children’s Judgments do Not Always Agree with Adults’.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39 (1): 182-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(85)90035-9.
  63. Treiman, Rebecca. 2004. “Phonology and Spelling.” In Handbook of Children’s Literacy. Edited by Terezinha Nunes and Peter Bryant, 31-42. Dordrecht: Springer.
  64. Treiman, Rebecca, and Christopher Barry. 2000. “Dialect and Authography. Some Differences Between American and British Spellers.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (6): 1423-1430. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/sites.wustl.edu/dist/7/2420/files/2020/02/treiman_barry_2000_-_dialect_and_authography.pdf.
  65. Trigo Ferre, Rosario Lorenza. 1988. “The Phonological Derivation and Behavior of Nasal Glides.” Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/14408.
  66. Tuggy, David H. 1979. “Tetelcingo Nahuatl.” In Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar 2. Modern Aztec Grammatical Sketches. Edited by R. W. Langacker, 1-140. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics; Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington.
  67. Ulrich, Charles H. 1993. “The Glottal Stop in Western Muskogean.” International Journal of American Linguistics 59 (4): 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1086/466212.
  68. Valiñas C., Leopoldo. 2013. “El náhuatl actual en Jalisco.” Tlalocan 9: 41-69.
  69. Velázquez Patiño, Eduardo P. 2014. “Intonation Patterns of Morelos Nahuatl.” In Proceedings of Speech Prosody. Vol. 7. Edited by Dafydd Gibbon, Daniel Hirst, and Nick Campbell, 487-491. Poznań: Polskie Towarzystwo Fonetyczne. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-85.
  70. Whorf, Benjamin L. 1946. “The Milpa Alta Dialect of Aztec with Notes on the Classical and the Tepoztlan Dialects.” In Linguistic Structures of Native America. Edited by Osgood Cornelius and Harry Hoijer, 367-397. New York: Viking Fund Publication in Anthropology.
  71. Whorf, Benjamin L., Lyle Campbell, and Frances Karttunen. 1993. “Pitch Tone and the “Saltillo” in Modern and Ancient Nahuatl.” International Journal of American Linguistics 59 (2): 165-223. https://doi.org/10.1086/466194.
  72. Wolgemuth, Carl. 1969. “Isthmus Veracruz (Mecayapan) Nahuat Laryngeals.” In Aztec Studies 1. Phonological and Grammatical Studies in Modern Nahuatl Dialects. Edited by Dow F. Robinson, 1-14. Norman: University of Oklahoma/Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  73. Wolgemuth, Carl. 2007. “Nahuatl Grammar of the Townships of Mecayapan and Tatahuicapan de Juárez, Veracruz.” Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. Accessed on September 1st, 2025. https://www.sil.org/resources/archives/1919.

Cómo citar

Aguilar, Andrés Ehécatl. 2025. «Volver a Revisar Los Nasales En El náhuatl De Karttunen Y Lockhart: Nuevas Ideas Basadas En La fonología Y La fonética Del náhuatl De Chicontepec». Estudios De Cultura Náhuatl 71 (diciembre):152-90. https://doi.org/10.22201/iih.30618002e.2026.71.78730.
  • Resumen visto - 95 veces
  • PDF (English) descargado - 49 veces